Google for biology.

The search engine, the directory, and the marketplace for all of life science — built for the humans, and the AIs, now doing the science.

type / for commands
proteinToll-like receptor 2 · TLR2 O60603free
structure2Z7X · TLR2–TLR6 heterodimer PDBfree
scholarRuslan Medzhitov · innate immunity Yalefree
datasetTLR agonist binding panel curated · 4,180 rows
Pre-seed · Raising $250K Steven Ness, PhD  ·  sness@sness.net
01 The Problem

Biology's knowledge is the most valuable corpus on Earth — and it has no front door.

35M+ papers, 250M+ proteins, 226K+ structures and millions of datasets sit in dozens of silos with no shared index, no map, and no search across them.

"Data sources vary in formats, metadata and identifiers, lacking standardization — making it difficult to merge information across fields."— Taylor & Francis, 2025
  • A scientist asks "who worked on this target, what bound, what data is for sale?" — and burns days across PubMed, PDB, UniProt, Scholar & LinkedIn.
  • The people who generate the world's biology data — the scientists — capture none of its value. There's no way to publish a dataset and get paid.
  • Incumbents (Clarivate, CAS) were built for a human clicking a webpage — not the agents now reading, and buying, science.
No Google. No Wikipedia. No App Store. We're building all three.
02 Why Now

A three-year window just opened.

  • AI agents are the new readers — and the new buyers — of science. They need structured, addressable, priced, machine-payable data, not HTML built for human eyes.The web reserved a status code for exactly this — 402 Payment Required. It's been dormant for 25 years.
  • The data explosion — AlphaFold, PMC full-text, UniProt, PDB — finally makes one organized graph possible.
  • Every techbio team is rebuilding this internally and hating it. Build-vs-buy just flipped.

The window to become the default index — before each lab's in-house graph calcifies into permanence — is open now.

Be the index
before the lock-in.
03 The Solution

One front door to all of biology.

doi.bio is the search engine, the directory, the marketplace, and the ad network for life science — over a pre-connected graph stored as the plain markdown that agents read natively.

Pillar I
Search
Instant omnibox + slash commands over our own index of the whole graph.
→ the Google
Pillar II
Directory
Every protein, paper, lab, company & dataset — organized and addressable.
→ the Wikipedia
Pillar III
Marketplace
Scientists publish data and get paid; humans and machines buy what they need.
→ the App Store
Pillar IV
Ads
Contextual sponsorship on every entity page — the most targeted inventory in science.
→ AdWords for biology
For humans and for AIs. Every page is a webpage, an API, and a price.
04 Already Running

Not a deck idea — a running system.

35M+
Papers (PubMed)
8M+
Full-text articles (PMC)
250M+
Proteins (UniProt)
226K+
Structures (PDB)
67K+
Researcher profiles
104K+
Unified person records
1,000+
Biotech companies
114K+
Files, all plain-text
Already wired: 290,641 PDB→protein· 204,213 PDB→paper· 57,188 scholar→pubs· 133,626 indexed entities· sub-second search over 7.27M full-text articles.
05 Pillar I · Search

Type anything. Get the graph.

An instant, keyboard-first omnibox over our own index — the speed of "Google for gamers," pointed at all of biology. Slash commands route anywhere; everything else searches the graph live.

Competitors have the data.
We have the search box.
/scholarCRISPR base editing
/proteinscope to proteins in our indexinternal
/paperscope to papers (PubMed · PMC)internal
/structurescope to PDB structuresinternal
/datasetscope to the marketplaceinternal
/pdbjump to RCSB PDBexternal
/gfall through to Googleexternal
06 Pillar II · Directory

Wikipedia gave every topic a page. Now it's all of biology.

Every entity gets a clean, addressable home page — markdown for humans, an API for machines — cross-linked into the graph. Browsable by a person, crawlable by an agent.

Proteins
250M+
Structures
226K+
Papers
35M+
Researchers
104K+
Companies
1,000+
Pathways
curated
Diseases
linked
Organisms
indexed
Datasets
marketplace
Labs
register by PR
Tools & Models
growing
Methods
growing
07 Pillar III · The Network

Scientists bring their own data — and get paid for it.

Wikipedia's contributor flywheel and GitHub's openness — with a paycheck. We never hold the original: you keep your data, we hold the map, and the money routes back to you.

The network grows from data
we don't pay to create.
1
Keep your data where it livesA public git repo cloned from our template vaults, organized by DOI.
2
Register by one pull requestAn ORCID ↔ repo handshake auto-verifies you. No server to run, no auth backend.
3
We render, index & serve itLive at you.doi.bio — searchable, linked into the graph, machine-readable.
$
You earn on every useWhen a human or an AI uses your paid data, you keep 70%.
08 Pillar III · Marketplace

Some data free. Some paid. All of it discoverable.

The open baseline (PubMed, PDB, UniProt) pulls users in. Premium datasets and pay-per-use monetize them — and doi.bio takes 20–30% of every transaction.

Marketplace commission20–30%
Contributor vault hosting$50–500 / mo
Featured / sponsored listing$500–2K / mo
PubMed · PDB · UniProt baseline
open public corpus
FREE
Curated kinase–disease associations
academic lab · 12K edges
ML-ready protein embeddings
AI startup · model-native
Proprietary compound–target set
ex-pharma scientist
Pay-per-query / export
metered, per call
09 Built for Machines

Your best customer doesn't have a mouse.

Every page is markdown an agent reads natively and an endpoint it can pay. Agents buy exactly the data a model needs — per query, per token, per dataset — and the money routes to the scientist who made it.

Humans browse. Machines buy.
Scientists get paid.
agent · doi.bio data session
agent> GET doi.bio/protein/O60603.md 200 OK · 1,204 tokens · markdown billed $0.002 → nesslab (curator) agent> GET market/kinase-disease.csv 402 Payment Required → $2.00 agent> PAY 402 ✓ 200 OK $1.40 → seller · $0.60 → platform
10 Pillar IV · Ads

Contextual ads on every page. AdWords for biology.

Every page already knows its exact biological context — the protein, the disease, the lab. That's the most precisely targeted ad inventory in science. Advertisers: pharma, reagent & instrument vendors, CROs, recruiters.

Sponsored company profile$1,000 / mo
Sponsored category page$2,000 / mo
Job listing · recruiter sub$300 · $2K / mo
Toll-like receptor 2
TLR2 · O60603
Sponsored
insitro
EvolutionaryScale
Celsius Therapeutics
Postdoc · innate immunityhiring
11 The Model

Four revenue lines on one corpus — and a flywheel.

doi.biocompounding
knowledge graph
more data
scientists paid
more users + AIs
ads + take-rate
Search & ads — contextual inventory$1–2K / page-mo
Marketplace — dataset take-rate20–30%
AI data API — per query / token$99–999 / mo
Enterprise — data licensing & self-host$25–150K / yr
TAM scientific software + databases$25B+
+ life-science marketing & the AI-data economygrowing
SOM Year 1–2$0.5–1M
12 The Moats

Why this compounds — and can't be cloned.

01 Core
The compounding link graph
Anyone can download PubMed. Nobody cheaply reproduces 134K resolved entities + ~800K curated links. Each new source multiplies the connections — value grows faster than size.
02 Timing
AI-native substrate
Stored as the markdown agents read — and priced with 402. For incumbents, "be AI-native" is a re-platform that fights their own customers.
03 Network
Open contributor flywheel
Every vault is a forkable git repo; scientists register by PR and get paid. The network grows from data we don't pay to create — Wikipedia economics with a marketplace.
04 Model
Counter-positioning on price
$100/mo and locally-hostable vs $50K/seat. Incumbents can't match without destroying their own margin — the disruptor's wedge.
05 Platform
Index + marketplace = the toll road
Be the index everyone searches and the rail every dataset is sold on. Once others build on it, the position is hard to displace.
06 Founder
Founder-market fit
CASP-validated scientific judgment and the ability to build the whole data stack solo. Most knowledge-graph founders have one, not both.
13 Founder–Market Fit

The receipts.

Steven Ness — PhD, Computer Science. Building doi.bio solo: ingestion, entity resolution, indexing, and a 7.27M-article search engine.

Builds the data infra
— and knows what's real.
CASP15 ligands · retrospective re-run · 2026

Re-ran the targets through current AF3-class predictors — chai-1, Protenix, Boltz, IntelliFold, Gnina. Best predicted pose per target; the field's "success" bar is ≈ 2 Å RMSD.

COFACTOR

S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) — predicted pose 0.14 Å RMSD, LDDT-PLI 0.97. Protenix · T1124.

DRUG-LIKE

A drug-like inhibitor (DW0) — 0.20 Å, LDDT-PLI 0.99. Boltz · T1188.

GLYCAN

An N-glycan (NAG) — 0.34 Å, LDDT-PLI 0.96. Boltz · T1187.

14 The Ask

Raising $250K pre-seed.

A lean, solo-first round — ~18 months to ship the wedge (search over the live graph + the first paid datasets) and reach first revenue. Then raise a seed from strength.

Target: first revenue · 10+ paying design partners

On a SAFE — default $250K, room to expand to ~$400K for the right partner.

Use of funds · ~18 months
Founder salary — full-time on doi.bio$50K
Infra, compute & search hosting$50K
Data, APIs & LLM ingestion$28K
Fractional design / front-end / BD$54K
GTM & design-partner growth$33K
Legal, accounting & buffer$35K

Google for biology.

Organize all of biology. Pay the people who made it. Sell it to the machines that need it.
$250K Pre-seed Steven Ness, PhD  ·  sness@sness.net
doi.bio  /  pre-seed
← → or space to navigate
01 / 16